This is my last Internet for the next 3 days.

I’m in Tanzania about to go off Internet for 3 days, so this post is rushed since I’m about to board the plane in 5 minutes.

I just completed a further analysis.

In the 12 weeks before/after the second COVID peak, 3.43 sites got better for every site that got worse. Why? Omicron variant was less deadly. Just as expected for a less deadly variant.

In the 12 weeks before/after the vaccine rollout at the end of 2020 (12/27/20 center date), the ratio was 1:1 (same total number of sites got better vs. worse), but the aggregate numbers showed that odds were 1.66 on an aggregate case/death basis that things got worse.

Short story: this data behaves exactly as you’d expect and what it says is devastating.

The raw data shows a big, statistically significant signal showing the vaccine was harmful.

The burden is now on those promoting the COVID vaccines to show that this data supports their hypothesis. This is a very heavy burden that I don’t believe they can meet.

I predict no one will try.

Share