I’ll just leave these here… if you find more, please link in comments.

Just to appease the intelligentsia, defining ‘adherent’ (vs. nonadherent) without considering military context - ie: without stating that the COVID-19 products were mandatory else get the boot - is a tad disingenuous. Due to the role of coercion, perhaps more appropriate descriptors might include ‘willing adherence’, ‘non-willing adherence’ and non-adherent. We can tack on ‘yokel’ to the latter descriptor. I don’t mind.

https://www.wititudes.com/wp-content/uploads/wouldnt-say-youre-stupid-you-are-ecard.jpg

If these descriptors were used, how would the willing adherers and non-willing adherers be distributed in terms of General Intelligence ranking, I wonder? Also, I would very much like to see how this standardized ‘General Intelligence Score (GIS) is assessed/measured.

Mikael Elinder, Oscar Erixson, Mattias Öhman, Cognitive ability, health policy, and the dynamics of COVID-19 vaccination, Journal of Health Economics, Volume 91, 2023, 102802, ISSN 0167-6296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102802.

Meital Zur, Leah Shelef, Elon Glassberg, Noam Fink, Ilan Matok, Limor Friedensohn, Are intelligent people more likely to get vaccinated? The association between COVID-19 vaccine adherence and cognitive profiles, Vaccine, Volume 41, Issue 40, 2023, Pages 5848-5853, ISSN 0264-410X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.019