Biden Steals From Veterans to Fund Illegals

In a revealing confrontation, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) has cast a spotlight on a troubling discrepancy within the Biden administration’s policy priorities, questioning the allocation of resources towards illegal immigrants over American veterans. The senator’s pressing of Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough lays bare a stark reality: as the nation grapples with an unprecedented surge in illegal border crossings, our veterans, who have laid everything on the line for our freedom, face neglect and prolonged waits for benefits and medical care.

The Cost of Misplaced Priorities

Frank Tammaro (95) is a U.S. veteran who fought in the Korean War

New York evicted Frank from his nursing home to build a shelter for illegals

Remember this man when you vote pic.twitter.com/ApHmRbaJZ7

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 3, 2024

In fiscal year 2022, American taxpayers footed a staggering $94.3 million bill for the medical expenses of detained migrants, a sum that, under any other administration, might have been directed towards alleviating the struggles faced by our veterans. This financial allocation occurs against a backdrop of over 1 million veterans languishing in limbo, waiting for the VA to process their claims – a process that purportedly takes an average of five months, according to VA claims, though evidence suggests an exacerbating backlog.

The plight of these veterans stands in stark contrast to the swift accommodation of migrants, as illustrated by the case of Frank Tammaro, a 95-year-old Korean War veteran evicted from his New York nursing home to make room for illegal immigrants. This incident is not an isolated one but a symptom of a broader issue: a systemic reprioritization that sees veterans, once at the forefront of national concern, now seemingly relegated to the background.

A Flood of Illegal Immigration

Since President Biden’s tenure began, the U.S. has seen the number of illegal immigrants double. From approximately 10.2 million to over 20 million in only 3 years. That includes 1.7 million “gotaways.” This influx, and the administration’s response to it, raises questions about the federal government’s commitment to its veterans. The VA, established to serve those who served the nation, appears to be diverting its focus and resources towards managing the consequences of a porous border policy, as veterans who seek the benefits and care they were promised face delays and denials.

Senator Blackburn’s critique underscores a troubling dichotomy: the choice to prioritize the needs of those who enter the country illegally over the veterans who fought to protect it. This choice not only undermines the foundational principles of the VA but also reflects a broader misallocation of priorities within the current administration.

Incorporating the fundamental legal principle that illegal immigrants are subject to removal and return to their country of origin provides a stark legal backdrop against which the allocation of resources by the Biden administration can be critically examined. This principle, firmly embedded in U.S. immigration law, underscores a clear distinction in the government’s obligations towards its citizens, particularly veterans, versus those who have entered the country unlawfully.

Legal Framework and Obligations to Veterans

The legal obligations of the United States to its veterans are unequivocal. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was specifically established to serve the men and women who have donned the uniform of the U.S. Armed Forces, offering them a range of benefits from healthcare to disability compensation. These obligations are rooted in the recognition of the sacrifices veterans have made and are enshrined in numerous laws and statutes that mandate the provision of these services and benefits, reflecting a societal contract of utmost priority.

Legal Status of Illegal Immigrants

Contrasting sharply with the commitments to veterans are the legal stipulations concerning illegal immigrants. U.S. immigration law dictates that individuals who enter or remain in the country without authorization are subject to removal proceedings. This legal framework does not confer the same rights or entitlements seen in the veterans’ affairs system; rather, it establishes a process for adjudicating such cases, often culminating in deportation.

The redirection of significant resources towards the healthcare and benefits for illegal immigrants, as highlighted by Senator Marsha Blackburn’s critique, not only raises questions of legal consistency but also of priority. While humanitarian considerations are vital, they operate within a legal framework that fundamentally distinguishes between the rights of citizens, particularly those who have served, and the status of those in the country illegally.

The Ethical and Legal Misalignment

The allocation of VA resources to individuals not legally entitled to remain in the country represents a profound misalignment with both the letter and spirit of U.S. law. This misallocation not only diverts resources intended for veterans, who have lawful and morally prioritized claims to government support, but it also contravenes the legal processes established for handling illegal immigration.

The choice between supporting our veterans and allocating resources to illegal immigrants, who legally have no claim to our country’s resources, should not be complex. The fundamental legal principle mandating the removal of illegal immigrants clarifies the government’s priorities, emphasizing that our veterans, who have dedicated their lives to our nation’s service and defense, must come first. It is a straightforward decision to uphold our nation’s laws and moral obligations, ensuring that policies unequivocally favor those who have honorably served over individuals who are in the country unlawfully. This approach is not just a legal imperative but a moral one, reflecting our collective gratitude and responsibility to those who have worn our nation’s uniform.

Reaffirming Commitments to Veterans

In light of these legal considerations, it becomes imperative for policy decisions to reflect a recommitment to the nation’s veterans. This involves not only adhering to the established legal frameworks governing immigration and veterans’ affairs but also ensuring that the allocation of resources honors the service and sacrifices of military personnel. By upholding the legal and moral obligations to veterans above other considerations, the government reaffirms its dedication to those who have unreservedly dedicated themselves to the country.

A Call for Reevaluation

The situation demands a reevaluation of how resources are allocated and to whom they are provided. The VA’s mission has always been to serve our veterans first and foremost, a mission that should not be compromised by the political or social pressures of the moment. The Biden administration must address these concerns, ensuring that the sacrifices of our veterans are honored with more than just words.

The case of Frank Tammaro and the millions of veterans awaiting their due benefits should serve as a wake-up call. It is a reminder that a nation’s greatness is measured not by how it treats criminal invaders, but by how it honors its heroes. As discussions unfold and policies are debated, one principle should remain clear: our veterans deserve better. They deserve to be prioritized, respected, and provided for, as they have provided for us. It is not merely a matter of policy but of principle.